Two people with the same job title buy in completely different ways
One wants the number and a fast answer. The other wants context and someone to trust. Send them the same page and you convert one of them at best.
We work out how each lead decides, then build around it
DISC is a shorthand for how someone wants to be sold to
A D wants the bottom line in one line. An S wants context and reassurance.
Sam Ryder
Reads as DWe read the signals a person leaves in public
How they write and what they post about says how they evaluate a decision.
Reads fast. Wants the number first.
Profile built from public signals
That becomes a profile of how to talk to them
Not a label to put on the person. A set of rules for the page and the message.
Decision style
D · DominantBig Five
The page and the email get rebuilt around that profile
Proof moves up for the analytical buyer. The case study leads for the one who needs trust.
Analytical
Relationship
Same offer. The structure moves, not just the words.
Your prospect never sees any of this
They just get a page that says things the way they like to read them.
Reads as: direct, proof-first
Internal writing brief, never shown
What the prospect sees
What the profile changes on the page
Reads decision style from public signals
Grounded in the Big Five
Big Five, per lead
Sets the tone, direct or warm
Direct
Warm
Reorders the page per person
Picks which proof leads
Leads with what they trust
Invisible to the prospect
Reads as: direct, proof-first
It is already booking meetings
The fair questions about profiling
The base is the Big Five, the most validated personality model in psychology and the one used in academic research. DISC sits on top as a practical shorthand for communication style, and we treat it as exactly that: a heuristic for how to talk to someone, not a diagnosis. Where the two disagree, the page falls back to what we can actually observe about the person and their role.
We would rather you measured it than took our word for it. Across the first 40 early-access teams, conversion on outreach links rose 38% on average, which is a real number from a small and self-selected group. Run half your leads to personalized pages and half to your normal page in the same week, then compare. If it does not move for you, that is worth knowing in week one.
No. We adjust three things: the tone of the writing, the order the sections appear in, and which piece of proof leads. We never assign a personality label to a person, we never store one as a judgement about them, and we never show anything of the kind to the prospect or put it in a CRM field.
The downside is small by design. Even on a wrong read the page still carries your offer, your brand and true facts about their company, so what changes is a slightly different tone and a different section order. A wrong read costs you a less well-tuned page, not a wrong one.
Yes, per campaign. Run on role and company context only and you still get research-driven pages and messages, just without the tone and ordering layer. Some teams start that way for their first batch and switch it on once they have a control to compare against.
No. There are no labels, no scores and nothing about personality anywhere on the page. What they see is a page that happens to say things in the order they prefer to read them, which reads as a well-written page rather than as personalization.
Explore more
Deep Research
The homework behind every profile.
Personalized Pages
Where the profile turns into a real page.
Personalized Messaging
The message written for the same person.
Analytics & Notifications
Prove the profiling worked on your own leads.
See two real pages for two different buyers
Seven days free. Generate your first 25 and compare them side by side.
Jimmy de Groot
Founder of NeuroPage
Live in 2 minutes · Your first 25 leads in your own branding · 7 days free